As the first comparative study of Colossians and 1 Peter, the book fills a lacuna by exploring each authors understanding of the new existence and the means to righteous living. If the epistles end up offering almost identical paraenesis, why do they have such distinctive theological patterns of thought? The conventional starting point in Colossian and 1 Peter studies centers on the recipients needs. Much has been learned from these investigations and is kept in view. However, the extent to which each epistles theology reflects an underlying pattern of ideas within each authors worldview is less well understood. Setting the authors views in the context of the literature of early Judaism throws fresh light on his thought-world and understanding of the new existence and moral enablement. Evidence exists which indicates that streams of traditions in Early Judaism Literature, factors other than the recipients needs, contribute to the theology within each epistle and may account for distinctive aspects identified between Colossians and 1 Peter. Exploration of 4QInstruction and the Hodayot, texts discovered at Qumran, provides precedents, precursors, and parallels for the distinctive emphases investigated. Thus, they shed new light on each epistle.

Robert L. Cavin, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA.